Archive for September, 2009

Is Obama a Narcissist? By Robin of Berkeley

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

Many of us are asking ourselves the million dollar question: are Obama and his crew narcissists?

(Translation: What in God’s name is wrong with these people? Are they on medications? Are they off their medications?

Are we being unknowingly subjected to some new reality show, Extreme Alien Invasion?)

Now as a newbie conservative, I have a long way to go to herald myself as an expert on conservatism, neoconservatism, paleoconservatism (whatever that is), and the like.

But one thing I do know is crazy — and that’s not just because I’ve been a licensed psychotherapist for over 20 years. It’s because for almost 30 years I’ve been eating, sleeping, and living with crazy, what I have dubbed the Psycho Network.

There are plenty of nice folks around these parts (although mention the words Sarah Palin or Tea Parties and they’ll morph into Linda Blair in the Exorcist). But we also lots of Bernadine Dohrn look-alikes who appear to have just crawled out from some prehistoric rock.

So, let me take a stab at the burning question of Obama’s mental health status.

FOR THE COMPLETE STORY FOLLOW THIS LINK

How to Prepare For China’s Coming Derivative Default by Graham Summers

Monday, September 14th, 2009

In case you have not heard the news, China has announced that it will be instructing its state-owned enterprises to potentially default on their derivatives contracts. As I have written extensively in the past, the derivatives market is a massive time bomb just waiting to go off. China’s latest move may be the match that lights the fuse.

All told, US Commercial banks own $202 trillion in derivatives in notional value. To put that number into perspective, it’s roughly four times the global GDP. And 96% of this exposure sits on five banks’ balance sheets. I’ve shown the below chart before, but it’s worth re-visiting (chart is denominated in TRILLIONS).

Of course, not ALL of the $202 trillion these guys own is “at risk.” As their name implies, derivatives are “derived” from underlying assets (homes, debt, etc). The actual “at risk” money can be far FAR smaller than the “notional” value of derivatives outstanding.

However, when you’re talking about $200+ trillion, even a marginal amount of “at risk” money can mean ENORMOUS losses. Consider, if 1% of that $200 trillion were at risk, you’re talking about $2 trillion in capital. Now, if even 10% of those bets go bad, you’re talking about $200 billion in losses.

FOR COMPLETE STORY FOLLOW THIS LINK

Pre-Existing Conditions? By Don Stott

Monday, September 14th, 2009

This is further proof that both Republicans and Democrats are, to put it kindly, totally ignorant of some of life’s basic facts, and even common sense. Both sides want it to be compulsory for insurance companies to be forced to insure people with “pre-existing conditions.” Think about that one, with just a grain of common sense or a basic kindergarten knowledge of economics.

If you have a house which is falling down from termites, has a leaky roof, iron plumbing, stopped up septic tank, or whatever, and you approach a home insurance company, wanting full coverage for your house, and they say “you’ve got to be kidding,” should the D.C. Gang force the insurance company to issue you a homeowners policy? If you never cut your grass, never paint, never shovel snow off your sidewalk, and your neighbors consider you a menace, would any insurance company issue you a policy? Both Dems and Repubs might want big daddy government to force them to issue it, assuming the health care thing goes into effect. Why not throw pre-existing conditions out the window for home coverage?

FOR THE COMPLETE STORY FOLLOW THIS LINK.

If Obama’s not stupid …by Thomas Sowell

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

The most important thing about what anyone says are not the words themselves but the credibility of the person who says them.

The words of convicted swindler Bernie Madoff were apparently quite convincing to many people who were regarded as knowledgeable and sophisticated. If you go by words, you can be led into anything.

No doubt millions of people will be listening to the words of President Barack Obama tomorrow night when he makes a televised address to a joint session of Congress on his medical-care plans. But, if they think that the words he says are what matters, they can be led into something much worse than being swindled out of their money.

One plain fact should outweigh all the words of Barack Obama and all the impressive trappings of the setting in which he says them: He tried to rush Congress into passing a massive government takeover of the nation’s medical care before the August recess – for a program that would not take effect until 2013!

FOR COMPLETE STORY FOLLOW THIS LINK.

Government performance

Friday, September 4th, 2009

Government run health care. If those words provide you some measure of comfort, let’s look at some well-known government programs and see how they have performed throughout the years.
The U.S. Postal Service was established in 1775 and losing a billion dollars a year…the same government that wants to run healthcare has had 234 years to get the distribution of lettered mail right and failed.

Social Security was established as a “safety net” in 1935. The original intent of Social Security was to provide a monthly benefit for workers who retired at age 65 financed by contributions these workers made over their career. The program has expanded over the years by, among other changes, extending benefits to the retiree’s family, the survivors of deceased workers, providing benefits for the disabled, allowing retirement at age 62, and providing cost-of-living increases. 79 years later, it cannot sustain itself and has grown well beyond its intended purpose.

Fannie Mae was established in 1938 as part of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal in the wake of the collapse of the national housing market during the Great Depression. Its original intent was to provide local banks with federal money to finance home mortgages in an attempt to raise levels of home ownership and the availability of affordable housing. It was “rescued” by taxpayers and is now broke. Seventy one years and it is insolvent.

War on Poverty was introduced in 1964 as part of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society and expanding government programs. In effect, it broadened the scope of FDR’s New Deal. Throughout its 45 years of existence, about one trillion dollars has been taken from the American taxpayer and thrown at the “the poor.” Poverty among Americans between ages 18-64 has fallen only marginally since 1966, from 10.5% then to 10.1% today. Another government administered program that hasn’t worked.

Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965 as part of LBJ’s Great Society. Its roots can be traced back to Harry Truman’s call for a national health insurance plan. Medicare has continued to expand throughout its 44 year existence with premiums rising over 1000% since inception. Congress has been working national health care for 44 years and it is insolvent.

Freddie Mac was established in 1970 because Fannie Mae had become too big. In 1968, with the pressures of the Vietnam War straining the national budget, President Lyndon Johnson took Fannie Mae’s debt portfolio off the government balance sheet; Fannie Mae was converted into a publicly traded company owned by investors. Two years later, Freddie Mac was launched, primarily to keep Fannie Mae from functioning as a monopoly. So the government established two subsidized banking organizations to keep one from becoming a monopoly? Freddie Mac went public in 1989 and was a recipient of massive amounts of federal money to “rescue” it.
AMTRAK was organized by the federal government in May of 1971. Its preferred stock is owned by the federal government and the board of directors is appointed by the President. Despite the best attempts of the government to manipulate the rails, Amtrak has received billions of dollars of taxpayer money in order to stay in operation. Thirty seven years and still not profitable.
The Department of Education was established in 1980 by combining offices from several federal agencies. The department’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access. It has 4,200 employees and $68.6 billion budget. As a measure of effectiveness, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), also called the “Nation’s Report Card, shows little improvement. Stuart Kerachsky, the Acting Commissioner, National Center for Education Statistics, stated: “We have not seen any significant changes in Black-White or Hispanic-White score gaps since 2004.” Hardly billions of dollars well spent.

The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) of 2009 took trillions of dollars in a thinly veiled political payoff to rescue companies that were “too big to fail.” Maybe too big to fail is just “too big.”
Last (up until this point), but certainly not least “Cash for Clunkers” was established in 2009 and went broke in days after its inception! The plan took older vehicles off the road in order to entice Americans to buy new cars as long as they got better mileage than the older cars. Instead of providing a boost to American care sales, imports saw the greatest surge courtesy of the American taxpayer.
With this long history of failure, is there any doubt as to what the results of a government administered health care system will be? Have we forgotten that the citizens and tax payers elect officials to represent us? Have we forgotten that capitalism, for all its warts, is much more efficient and produces a better product than that which is government run? Is there any doubt that if a national health care plan is adopted, liberals and statists will use whatever loopholes are inherently in the legislation to expand national control beyond its intended scope? Given past performance, Americans should be afraid, very afraid.

Pushing National Healthcare with Senator Kennedy’s Corpse by Linda Brady Traynham

Friday, September 4th, 2009

De Mortuis Nil Nisi Bonum Dicendum Est — In a Pig’s Ear.

In the biggest display of maudlin excess since — well, since “Jacko” died, but probably going back to the death of Elvis — the hive started shrieking that the health disaster bill should be renamed “Kennedy Care” and passed immediately in honor of a liar, a cad, a murderer, and a drunk who benefited handsomely for half a century because his brother had been president.

In the latest thoroughly typical demonstration of squashy sentiment and opportunism the Democrats and their trough-grubbing sycophants jumped right at the chance not to let an emotional “crisis” go to waste before Ted Kennedy’s body was cold on a gurney.

FOLLOW THIS LINK FOR THE COMPLETE STORY

THE COWBOY LIBERTARIAN: Obama the ‘Post Turtle’ by Patrick Dorinson

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

The days of fancy speeches and adoring rallies are over. The American people have been aroused from their infatuation and will now be judging President Obama on the cold hard facts not his rhetorical flourishes.

With President Obama taking some well deserved vacation on Martha’s Vineyard, that well known summer playground of the rich and famous, it might be a good time to evaluate the current state of the Obama Phenomenon.

Go here to read the complete article.

The Political Phase and the Death of Nations by Bill Bonner

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

The United States is in the third and fatal stage of a great country’s life-cycle – the political stage. In this stage, money and power migrate from the financial community to the political community. The politicians get away with taking trillions out of the productive economy and spending them on their pet projects and private corruptions.

Follow link for complete story.